PDA

View Full Version : OK, I'm impressed


Huguenot
12th June 2009, 03:35.35 AM
Ken couldn't have scripted this one any better.
This is a query involving horses with ML of 5-2 and under involving Razor Sharp Workouts.
Wow!

FAV1 'A' 00068 00033 49% 65% 81% 1.10 0.87 0.88 $4.5 $10 2.77
FAV1 'B' 00134 00065 49% 68% 79% 1.02 0.98 0.94 $4.2 $9 3.29
FAV1 'C' 00143 00059 41% 64% 75% 0.98 1.00 0.94 $4.7 $8 3.25
FAV1 'D' 00039 00014 36% 54% 59% 0.97 0.96 0.80 $5.4 $9 3.22
no "F" plays

FAV2 'A' 00034 00016 47% 71% 88% 1.06 1.00 0.98 $4.5 $7 2.51
FAV2 'B' 00099 00049 49% 65% 78% 1.15 0.95 0.91 $4.6 $10 3.08
FAV2 'C' 00178 00079 44% 63% 75% 1.01 0.96 0.93 $4.6 $8 3.38
FAV2 'D' 00064 00026 41% 66% 72% 0.91 1.03 0.90 $4.5 $9 3.53
FAV2 'F' 00009 00001 11% 56% 56% 0.19 0.71 0.59 $3.4 $3 0.84


The word "genius" is thrown around so carelessly these days -- but Ken, well, we're not worthy!!:D

DanG
12th June 2009, 07:01.12 AM
The word "genius" is thrown around so carelessly these days -- but Ken, well, we're not worthy!!:D
These must be numbers only obtainable in the UK mate. I have no idea what your ‘chin-wagging about and wish you wouldn’t fill a geezer’s head with this rubbish. :eek:

Outside of the subscriber zone…what is a razor anyway? ;) :)

km
12th June 2009, 10:31.35 AM
bloody brilliant!

thanks Andy, i print some similar stats in the newsletter for July, i have also been impressed with the clear separation the grades provide in the results

it is clear to me now, that the sneering attitude about betting chalk (me included) was another illusion. The public is making mistakes and even the most obvious betting favorites (such as those with strong workouts as he noted) are fair game with the Robot.

Huguenot
14th June 2009, 05:28.56 AM
I agree

I used to thumb my nose at the two chalk $18 exactas but there are times when those are overlays.

MikeDee
14th June 2009, 09:15.58 AM
Ken

I have a question on how FAV 1 and 2 indicators deal with ties.

Here are 2 races from Sat 6/13

Does the nFAV grade apply to all of the tied horses even if they are not entires?


tTRK nRACE rMLO nMLO tPGM nFAV1 nFAV2
CT 9 1 3 14 4 5
CT 9 1 3 12 4 5
CT 9 1 3 10 4 5
CT 9 4 3.5 6 4 5
In the above example are the 14,12,10 all graded as a 4? Is the 6 horse the FAV2 horse?


tTRK nRACE rMLO nMLO tPGM nFAV1 nFAV2
BEL 5 1 2.5 7 4 3
BEL 5 2 3 1 4 3
BEL 5 2 3 11 4 3
In this race are the 1 and 7 both graded as 4 and is the 11 horse the fav2 horse?

km
14th June 2009, 12:34.04 PM
Mike, read the Critical Extracts # 2