four m
24th October 2001, 09:21.30 PM
thanks ernie,
did not quite understand first part of your post--cramer--quirin--etc. too confusing for me. i try to keep it simple. i kinda agree on your track variant post--sometimes it helps, at times it doesn't. does it even out?? i do not know. today i was on the right end, tomorrow?? i do believe in track to track, distance adjustments. my problem is that all i've seen or heard about make adjustments in figures--not in time. my method needs to know 22.2 adjusted to say 22.4
not 22.4=86. hope i explained it properly.
thanks
p.s.--way to go glen!
did not quite understand first part of your post--cramer--quirin--etc. too confusing for me. i try to keep it simple. i kinda agree on your track variant post--sometimes it helps, at times it doesn't. does it even out?? i do not know. today i was on the right end, tomorrow?? i do believe in track to track, distance adjustments. my problem is that all i've seen or heard about make adjustments in figures--not in time. my method needs to know 22.2 adjusted to say 22.4
not 22.4=86. hope i explained it properly.
thanks
p.s.--way to go glen!