MikeDee
29th September 2001, 08:17.31 AM
Did a little reaserch on false favorites that looks interesting. I took the factors of Pow, Per, K, Htr, pscan and mike# and added the rankings. The best you could be is 6 (6*1) and the worst you could be is 54 (9*6).
Then I filtered on MLR (morn line rk) = 1 and off odds rank =1 and the sum of the above 6 factors >=18 (this would be an average of a rank of 3 for each of the 6 factors. Looked at all races on fast dirt excluding races with any first time starters and here is what I got.
Trk nWin nBet Win% aMut
AP 17 80 21% $5.59
BEL 23 78 29% $5.26
CRC 21 103 20% $5.57
CT 20 76 26% $6.45
DEL 22 99 22% $5.68
FE 27 132 20% $5.67
KEE 8 43 19% $4.88
LAD 10 67 15% $6.40
MNR 34 118 29% $6.15
PEN 17 96 18% $5.59
PHA 45 162 28% $5.64
PRM 13 84 15% $5.77
RET 2 22 9% $5.00
SA 17 79 22% $5.35
TDN 47 176 27% $5.51
TP 31 138 22% $5.35
WO 48 198 24% $5.29
I used both MLR and Off odds rank based on the concept that the public confirms the MLR by keeping it the fav while the HTR factors don't.
It looks like the ML handicapper and the public are pretty good at BEL, MNR, PHA, and TDN, but at the other tracks the fav doesn't do so good and maybe these are races where looking for overlays could payoff.
I would expect that field size could drop this win% still more if you filtered on fields of >=8 but didn't test it, would also reduce the number of plays.
Didn't check the reverse which would be fav's = 6 mlor =1 off odds=1 but checked it at on AP and it was 41%
Then I filtered on MLR (morn line rk) = 1 and off odds rank =1 and the sum of the above 6 factors >=18 (this would be an average of a rank of 3 for each of the 6 factors. Looked at all races on fast dirt excluding races with any first time starters and here is what I got.
Trk nWin nBet Win% aMut
AP 17 80 21% $5.59
BEL 23 78 29% $5.26
CRC 21 103 20% $5.57
CT 20 76 26% $6.45
DEL 22 99 22% $5.68
FE 27 132 20% $5.67
KEE 8 43 19% $4.88
LAD 10 67 15% $6.40
MNR 34 118 29% $6.15
PEN 17 96 18% $5.59
PHA 45 162 28% $5.64
PRM 13 84 15% $5.77
RET 2 22 9% $5.00
SA 17 79 22% $5.35
TDN 47 176 27% $5.51
TP 31 138 22% $5.35
WO 48 198 24% $5.29
I used both MLR and Off odds rank based on the concept that the public confirms the MLR by keeping it the fav while the HTR factors don't.
It looks like the ML handicapper and the public are pretty good at BEL, MNR, PHA, and TDN, but at the other tracks the fav doesn't do so good and maybe these are races where looking for overlays could payoff.
I would expect that field size could drop this win% still more if you filtered on fields of >=8 but didn't test it, would also reduce the number of plays.
Didn't check the reverse which would be fav's = 6 mlor =1 off odds=1 but checked it at on AP and it was 41%