PDA

View Full Version : HTR2001 Update


Ken Massa
5th September 2001, 01:38.53 AM
The September newsletter and the upgrade to HTR2001 are now available. Below are some of my thoughts on the expanded data for your handicapping ---->

Cramer Speed Par - located in top right header
This par is a bit different from the HTR Level Par. The HTR par is a measure of class hierarchy while the Cramer par is the expected speed rating that an average field at this track and class level will run. While checking each horse's pp's, notice if an entrant can run to the par regularly. This is particularly useful in maiden races when trying to assess the chances of first time starters. If all the shown horses have run well below par, then a FTS could default to victory. More predictable == horses entered in maiden races that have already achieved a speed figure near or above the Cramer par have a huge advantage over the FTS. First time starters will have to be very talented to beat an experienced runner that has already run to par.

Pedigree Ratings - located in Pedigree Screen or pp screens horse header
I'm really pleased with this rating and hit the first horse I bet with it on Sunday at DMR - a FTS with a superior pedigree rating in race 6, paid $30. This rating separates the sire and dam-sire data into distance/surface categories. Glen gave me a suggestion about the % of sire / dam-sire that I used and then augmented the formula if the horse was a FTS or making the first start on grass. I hope it proves useful in circumstances that require some scrutiny of the breeding such as 2/3yr maidens, grass races for youngsters, or perhaps turf sprints which are real specialty area that few handicappers deal with.

Trainer performance rating and Jockey performance rating
I have tweaked these a bit and now they are a bit more race specific. A jockey that has won with the horse recently will get a boost in the rating. A trainer that has been successful with blinkers or layoffs will get a boost in his number. Don't be confused if the number changes for the same jock or trainer from race to race, they should vary according to the circumstances, but the base number will remain within a 50 point range as we also want an appraisal of overall success. These ratings use win-pla-sho data, not just win%.

Compact Past-performances
This one screen will please many as it saves 70% on paper. Yet I did not want to sacrifice too much of the good data. The main goal was to print 6 horses to a page with as much info as possible. This would mean almost all races would print on two pieces of standard paper. Turns out that cutting the pp lines to 5 maximum and 3 workouts maximum was the answer. The header area remained mostly intact. The trip note had to sliced a bit, but everything else is there.

Advanced PP's
Added the trainer/jockey history to the far right of each pp line. This simple addition is very powerful for the thoughtful handicapper. You are able to see instantly such things as claim history and 'claim backs'. The 'claim back' can be a real eye opener == the term means that a horse was claimed away from a certain trainer some time ago, but then the same trainer re-claimed the horse and got him back. If the claim back occurs at a higher claiming price than
trainer lost him for - that is an extremely positive sign that the trainer thinks the horse is healthy and productive and wants him back in the barn.

Horse exits a "highly rated race'
You can identify races that were run much faster than the expected par for today's race with with the "++" symbol that appears next to the Cramer race speed figure in the new pp's. The "++" races had one or more fractional elements that were run faster than anyone in today's race will likely be able to muster. If an entrant looks bad on form, but has been facing superior runners in recent outings, he will likely find today's field less agressive, the pace easier to negotiate and the character of the other runners less competitive to deal with. Improvement is likely.

Food for thought - I appreciate your comments

Glen
5th September 2001, 08:30.00 AM
Howdy Ken,

The new additions to the PP are outstanding. . Condensed PP will save us much toner, paper, time and money. Cramer PARS and Pedigree and added "!" at points of call are lovely.

Particuliarly like the Jock/Trn name after each PP line. Something unique that is not available on any other PP to my knowledge. They say that a Trainer or Jky change to a higher ranked one is best. Most of the time, I don't have a clue if Trainer De Santis is better than Trainer Velasquez. Perhaps having a listing of the iTRN fig next to the name somewhere might help trainer stupid people like me. Or perhaps, an idea unpopular with some users might be to list the iTRN or iJKY rating instead of the name that way we would be able to quickly identify those positive/negative changes.

********************************************
Crazy Idea To Follow:
Something that I think would be helpful, but not sure if it is feasible to list the Avg PSCAN and the PSCAN Dif. of the contestants in each line of the PP. The reasoning behind this is perhaps we can find if a horse is truly finding an easier or more difficult field of contestants.

For example, let?s say to make things simple. We have a PPline where there were only 2 contestants.

Horse A has a PSCAN of 90
Horse B has a PSCAN of 92

Therefore the race would get a PSCAN rating of 91.
Horse A would get a PSCAN Diff of -2.0 for that race and Horse B would get a PSCAN diff of 0.

Now lets say that Horse A is now entered in a race where his PSCAN Diff is -0.5. In theory, Horse A might be in an easier/better position since he is facing an easier field.

Having such a rating would allow us to quickly determine if a horse was racing in a truly contentious race or against a bunch of pigs. Any thoughts on how this might work in real life? Or have I fallen off a stupid tree and hit every branch on the way down??? If so, that's ok cause there are other trees to climb?

Thanks for your feedback and keep up the good work,
Glen

Ken Massa
6th September 2001, 01:15.35 AM
Glen - good suggestions and thanks for your continuing excellent advice. When Glen talks, I listen, and usually follow through by implementing his ideas to the benefit of us all - this time there is a monkey wrench though .......

If there was a way, I would list the numerical value of any tr/jock switch for each horse that is changing barns or rider. We would then be able to instantly understand how effective this change might be on the horse. But it isn't possible for me to extract the previous race t/j information. Here are the details--->

Our daily racefiles from Equibase/HDW have a wealth of information that is computed for the specifics of today's conditions and date. However, we do not get the same information for each line of the pp's. If Pat Day is riding today, we can compute his rating based on the knowledge of everything he has done in the exact 365 days prior as well as today's race conditions. But, suppose the previous rider (last pp line) was Joe Blow. We cannot regroup to the previous race date and compute Joe Blow's jockey figure on that specific day. The logistics of that would be a quite a challenge for HDW.

The only possibility would be to store every past race and jockey rating in a database and call up the previous jockey rating when the horse is entered again. MikeD can do it with Access and VBA, but even he would probably shake his head at the mountain of data required for something that may be modestly effective.

The Pscan can be computed for each pp line though and is a good idea as a pp supplement number. I'll consider it after you have looked over the other pp data screens and the expanded Pscan screen I am planning.

BTW: it was MTKen's idea to put those "!" in the pp lines for a horse that has a clear lead.
I find that very useful too. MtKen (he really is from Montana) is one sharp handicapper.

Appreciate your insights Glen - keep em coming - one nice thing about the Windows version: there is room for almost everything in Landscape mode!

Glen
6th September 2001, 08:10.34 AM
Thanks Ken for the feedback. You guys gotta nice horse out there...Watched Officer easily win yesterday. Should be fun watching this one.

MtKen
6th September 2001, 01:41.24 PM
Ken:

Just belatedly read the newsletter (though I usually read it immediately,even before I download it) & realized i didn't have the new version of HTR 2001. Just dwnl'd it & to second Glen it is really cool. Love the trn/jk addition in the pp's & the jock/horse record in the jock/trn section. Thanks much for the ! for the 'loose on the lead' horse. I love to eliminate frontrunners @ LOW odds who get loose for the 1st 2 calls only to give it up before the wire.

In fact I could have saved $20 in today's B&B race (CRC 3) if I'd downloaded the upgrade earlier. The 9 Timucuan had the classic quitter line: 0! 0! & ran 2nd or 3rd last out @ the same class--went off @ 2/1 & grabbed a lead which stretched to @ least 1 1/2 lengths only to lose by 2 @ the wire in a 5F sprint. @ less than double-digit win prices I really think these "*&#^&+":?^%$@#$% quitting dogs", as my dear old Dad used to call them, are best avoided and/or bet against.

Great job again, Ken. Can you give us any idea of what new stuff will go into Export Files when they are ready to go?

KB

Glen
6th September 2001, 01:50.23 PM
Link to latest Windows Upgrade:

http://www.homebased2.com/km/dnl/HTR2001.exe

Ken Massa
6th September 2001, 05:54.22 PM
Glad you asked about the export MtKen. I am working on that now and the first new export will be all the 'advanced pp' data. Exporting data will be more efficient from the Windows version and there will be some helpful new bells and whistles to play with.

The first 20 or so data fields will match that of IMPACT export, so it should be easy enough to merge. It will export non-proprietary data from the last 3 pp lines and most of the info in the horse header. Proprietary data includes fractional times, complete BL etc. Can't give you all that or Equibase will get mad. But can export all the Cramer figure stuff and the pedigree/trainer/jockey ratings and whatever else is feasible.

Thanks for the nice comments and keep the suggestions coming.

Carl
6th September 2001, 06:26.19 PM
Ken,

I am presently merging HTR and IMPAC table.

So I should be able to merge HTR and "the new table" just as easily? Will the new fields be obtainable from old race files like the IMPAC was? Or will I only be able to get the new data into my data base from the day it becomes available for download.

BTW, I am willing to Beta test if you want for the new download.

later,
Carl

Ken Massa
7th September 2001, 12:50.56 AM
Should be a no-brainer on the merge Carl. The only fields you really need are date, track, race number and horse name to get a match. Problem with HTR4MSA is that I stuck the program number in front of the name field as a single text entry, but I guess you solved that by starting with char (4) in the name field for a match to the IMpact export.

I planned the Impact export to have about 20 initial data fields that were easy matches for any future versions. I will use those same basic fields and header names in the HTR2001 export. But I am also initiating a new "index" field. This will be unique number that identifies each and every race by a specific numerical code. Kind of like social security numbers - every race you export will have separate identity. This makes it possible to identify duplicates and keep a clean, ongoing, stand alone output file if the user wishes.

You can export older files in HTR2001 starting with Oct 1999 to present day. Earlier files may be missing some Cramer speed data. Otherwise, the sky is the limit and all your files are useful in the new export to create the new comma-delimited. Will take just one click to do it all.

Rick will post the beta-version as soon as I have the program workable. I appreciate the help in getting it off the ground.

fred4now
7th September 2001, 07:44.54 AM
Ken, I'm sure everybody has their wish list. Here is mine. Right now you have the option to export to an additional "all" file. I would like to be able to export to the "all" file only, without the individual track files. I just end up having to delete them and would be faster when redoing entire db.

hurrikane
7th September 2001, 08:05.55 AM
I agree Fred...I dont' use them either.

Ken, I know we talked about the trainer numbers before..wondering if you can use the trn jky ratings in htr to indicate whether the move from one trainer or jockey to anouther is positive or neg...or moot. Would be nice to get that in there although I understand about the impact trn number not working out.

New pps are great. like the new listing for d/s and life wins etc and the cramer numbers seem pretty strong. Curious possible to have a button to click to give the differences between the calls in sec. Similar to the drf formulator, click a button and you get 37.4 instead of 113.6 151.0. This is a real asset in turf races.....also, could the times be exported in this format as it is not the raw equibase times?

Carl
7th September 2001, 08:40.37 AM
Good idea about the option to export to "All" only. That's all I use too.

And I am in even worst shape than you guys, I am too dumb/lazy to delete the individual track folders, they just keep getting fatter and fatter and fatter. (Hope someday they don't go BOOM!)

later,
Carl

MtKen
7th September 2001, 12:57.42 PM
Carl:

If you go to your HTR folder under Windows Explorer, <> Tools, <> Find & then type **impc.txt you can bring up all those pesky files @ once & delete them easily.....**msa.txt or **msac.txt finds the others. U can later bring them back up from HTR data if need be.

Gramps
7th September 2001, 01:02.16 PM
There are two ways to do this, depending on how you use your all_msac.txt file. The actual commands are typed in ALL CAPS.

1) If you import your all_msac.txt file into Access every day or periodically, and then delete it:

Right after you've imported your all_msac.txt file into Access and are finished with it:

Go to Start - Programs - MS-DOS Prompt or to Start - Run and type: command

On the command line, type: CD\HTR (or a different directory if your HTRMSA or HTRMSAC program is in that directory).

Next, type: DEL *MSAC.TXT

You're done. All the individual track files made by HTRMSA or HTRMSAC are gone. NOTE: This will delete your all_msac.txt file, so be sure you're finished with it before doing this.


2) If you keep your all_msac.txt file around or want to keep it for some reason:

Go to Start - Programs - MS-DOS Prompt or to Start - Run and type: COMMAND

On the command line type CD\HTR (or a different directory if your HTRMSA or HTRMSAC program is in that directory).

Now type: MOVE ALL_MSAC.TXT ALL_MSAC.BAK

Next, type: DEL *MSAC.TXT

(That last will delete all of your track *msac.txt files -- the individual track files created by HTRMSA or HTRMSAC).

Now type: move all_msac.bak all_msac.txt

Now you have your original master file, and all the individual track files created by HTRMSA or HTRMSAC are gone.

Carl
7th September 2001, 01:02.43 PM
Mt Ken,

Oaky Doky, sounds good, will do.

Thanks buddy.

later,
Carl