edw
18th May 2005, 03:02.24 PM
I'm trying to get some sense of the similarities and differences (if any) between the various figs that are out in the marketplace that are created on the basis of the higher the number the better. Not the quality, precision and profit potential, but how to interpret them.
Among Beyer, Cramer, BRIS, cj's pacefigures, and HTR does anyone know if, for example, if a 90 is assigned to a horse's performance is that particular number supposed to signify the same performance among all of them? Or are some of them using different scales and numbers to represent performance and they are not directly comparable one to the other so that maybe a 90 Beyer might equate to 96 BRIS and a 100 HTR. Also, does anyone know how many points equate to a beaten length in a sprint and route for each?
Among Beyer, Cramer, BRIS, cj's pacefigures, and HTR does anyone know if, for example, if a 90 is assigned to a horse's performance is that particular number supposed to signify the same performance among all of them? Or are some of them using different scales and numbers to represent performance and they are not directly comparable one to the other so that maybe a 90 Beyer might equate to 96 BRIS and a 100 HTR. Also, does anyone know how many points equate to a beaten length in a sprint and route for each?